Grammar › Must, have to and should

Must, have to and should: positive sentences

480 fill-in-the-gap exercises, 48 tests of ten

Must and should take no -s and no to. Have to changes to has to and behaves like an ordinary verb.

Practice this form

Loading…

Getting your first question ready.

Where the obligation comes from

The classic test is who is imposing it:

Both are correct in most sentences, and Americans use have to in almost all of them. Where the difference shows clearly is in signs and rules, which take must: Passengers must show a ticket.

should for advice

Should does not oblige anyone. It gives an opinion about the best course:

You should take the earlier flight.

Stronger versions exist — ought to means the same thing and is slightly more formal; had better carries a warning: You had better leave now implies something bad happens if you do not.

have got to

In spoken British English, have got to replaces have to:

I*’ve got to** go.*

It has no past form, so had to covers the past for both.

should have

To say what would have been the better choice in the past:

You should have told me. — you did not, and that was a mistake.

All forms

Subjectmusthave toshould
I, you, we, theymust gohave to goshould go
he, she, itmust gohas to goshould go
pasthad to gohad to goshould have gone
futurewill have to gowill have to goshould go

Examples

Taken from the 480 sentences in this drill. The answer is highlighted.

Mistakes to avoid

Wrong: He have to leave now. correct: He has to leave now.

Have to is not a modal — it changes for he, she and it.

Wrong: Yesterday I must work late. correct: Yesterday I had to work late.

Must has no past form. Use had to.

Quick choices from this form

Other forms of Must, have to and should

Mixed practice → Done with this form? Try it among all the others — ten, twenty or thirty sentences from every form at once.